This PR has a bunch of various bug fixes for the code and tests, and many new tests. It's based on #144, so that needs to be merged first.
@robinnorth I cherry-picked your commit from the fix/missing-tests branch (Add tests for lib/util/noop.js - 5e7341d).
This PR has a bunch of various bug fixes for the code and tests, and many new tests. It's based on #144, so that needs to be merged first.
@robinnorth I cherry-picked your commit from the `fix/missing-tests` branch (Add tests for `lib/util/noop.js` - 5e7341d).
Thanks. I didn't originally plan on it being so big, but I was aiming for as close to 100% coverage as I could, and I kept adding more tests and finding more issues.
If it's too big, I can break it up into smaller PRs.
Thanks. I didn't originally plan on it being so big, but I was aiming for as close to 100% coverage as I could, and I kept adding more tests and finding more issues.
If it's too big, I can break it up into smaller PRs.
@robinnorth Do you think you'll have time to look this over, or should I just merge it? I would love to have a second pair of eyes on it, but I know you said you've been busy lately.
@robinnorth Do you think you'll have time to look this over, or should I just merge it? I would love to have a second pair of eyes on it, but I know you said you've been busy lately.
robinnorth
(Migrated from github.com)
left a comment
Copy link
Copy source
I've finished stepping through all the commits, run the example project and tested against my real-world project that's using this and everything seems good to merge to me!
I've finished stepping through all the commits, run the example project and tested against my real-world project that's using this and everything seems good to merge to me!
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
This PR has a bunch of various bug fixes for the code and tests, and many new tests. It's based on #144, so that needs to be merged first.
@robinnorth I cherry-picked your commit from the
fix/missing-testsbranch (Add tests forlib/util/noop.js- 5e7341d).@BehindTheMath nice one, that's a substantial PR! I'll take a proper look at it as soon as I have time.
Thanks. I didn't originally plan on it being so big, but I was aiming for as close to 100% coverage as I could, and I kept adding more tests and finding more issues.
If it's too big, I can break it up into smaller PRs.
@robinnorth Do you think you'll have time to look this over, or should I just merge it? I would love to have a second pair of eyes on it, but I know you said you've been busy lately.
Sorry, I've been very tardy in reviewing this for you. I have indeed been busy, but I'll make some time to check it out later and get back to you.
Thank you, I appreciate it.
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@var attrState = "data-pjax-state"This, and line 12 could be abstracted to use
var attrState = "data-pjax-state", as inattach-linkIs
attachFormka typo?Yup
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@var attrState = "data-pjax-state"True.
I've finished stepping through all the commits, run the example project and tested against my real-world project that's using this and everything seems good to merge to me!
I deleted the
fix/missing-testsbranch, since I cherry-picked the only commit from there into this PR, and we're close to 100% coverage.Cool, thanks!